Marketinglaw Update | September 2026
Recent editions
2025
2023

The very best writing on marketing and advertising law, for free – since 1999. To receive all our updates, register for marketinglaw’s monthly newsletter.
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
The ASA has upheld a complaint against Hotpoint’s claim to be “The UK’s Most Trusted Appliance Brand”, finding that basing the claim on the volume of five-star reviews from a third-party partner’s site was insufficiently transparent to consumers.
The ASA has ruled that savings claims on Nectar Sleep’s website were misleading, finding that the ad implied consumers could save up to 65% against Nectar Sleep’s usual selling prices when the claimed savings were in fact based on a comparison with an average of selected competitors’ prices.
The ASA has ruled against a clothing brand’s ad which in the ASA’s view irresponsibly glamorised smoking.
CAP has published an article on advertising AI products and the ASA has published a ruling against a “looksmaxxing” AI app for unsubstantiated before-and-after claims and harmful body image content targeting young people.
The High Court has refused the CMA’s application for an enforcement order that would have required Emma Sleep to adhere to a 1:2 “fixed volume requirement” in relation to its use of reference pricing.
The UK government plans to consult on making misleading discount practices automatically prohibited under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, while the CMA has escalated its drip pricing enforcement.
The ASA upheld complaints against two advertisers over unsubstantiated reference prices, a misleadingly presented bundle discounts and countdown clocks that falsely implied offers were about to end.