Marketinglaw Update | April 2026
Recent editions
2025
2023

The very best writing on marketing and advertising law, for free – since 1999. To receive all our updates, register for marketinglaw’s monthly newsletter.
The ASA has upheld complaints against an ad for an AI video app, rendering it irresponsible, harmful and likely to cause serious offence under the CAP Code.
The ASA upheld a complaint against Charmfay Shop’s online ad for a hooded jumper, finding that the claims and imagery had not been substantiated and were misleading.
The ASA upheld complaints against WiggyDog’s ad for a robot-dog toy, finding that claims and imagery exaggerated the product’s realism and functionality.
The International Chamber of Commerce has released a guide for marketers on how AI applies to its Advertising and Marketing Communications Code.
The ASA issues its first rulings clarifying the scope of the “less healthy” food advertising restrictions.
The UK Civil Aviation Authority has published a framework setting out guidance and principles on the environmental information airlines and other booking organisations should provide to passengers.
CAP’s enforcement notice and guidance note on loot box disclosure reinforce ASA rulings requiring mobile game publishers to disclose the presence of loot boxes and clearly signpost prize probabilities.
The ASA found that a Betway ad clearly depicted Sir Lewis Hamilton, a personality of strong appeal to under 18s, and that creative tweaks and platform targeting were not enough to avoid a breach of the “strong appeal” rules.
The ASA has upheld complaints against Kit & Kin’s green marketing for its nappy and wipes range, finding that “eco”, “sustainable” and “biodegradable” claims were absolute, unsubstantiated and gave a misleading impression of the products’ environmental impact.
The ASA holds online pharmacies responsible for customers’ social media posts sharing weight-loss medication referral codes.
The ASA found that ZING Toothpaste’s ads were misleading because they displayed five-star ratings and review counts that closely mimicked Trustpilot’s format but were not supported by the company’s actual Trustpilot profile.
The ASA ruled that a TV ad for travel insurance claiming that there was “no age limit” for cover was misleading because it failed to disclose material age-based restrictions on trip durations.