ASA lifts the lid on beauty brand's skincare efficacy claims
The ASA ruled that 111skin’s “Exosome Face Lift” product listing made efficacy claims that could not be substantiated and exaggerated the effects of the product, in breach of the CAP Code.
The ASA ruled that 111skin’s “Exosome Face Lift” product listing made efficacy claims that could not be substantiated and exaggerated the effects of the product, in breach of the CAP Code.
The ICO has published final guidance on storage and access technologies under PECR, incorporating new sections on the exceptions for statistical purposes, appearance and emergency assistance introduced by the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, and provided an update on its online tracking strategy.
The ASA has upheld complaints against Kit & Kin’s green marketing for its nappy and wipes range, finding that “eco”, “sustainable” and “biodegradable” claims were absolute, unsubstantiated and gave a misleading impression of the products’ environmental impact.
The ASA holds online pharmacies responsible for customers’ social media posts sharing weight-loss medication referral codes.
The ASA found that ZING Toothpaste’s ads were misleading because they displayed five-star ratings and review counts that closely mimicked Trustpilot’s format but were not supported by the company’s actual Trustpilot profile.
CAP publishes an article explaining the ASA’s remit in relation to cross-border ads.
The ASA has ruled against three advertisers for promoting prescription-only medicines (POMs) advertising weight-loss medications, finding some also irresponsible for exploiting consumers’ insecurities around body image.
The ASA has issued four beauty-related rulings as part of its wider work on LED facemasks for skincar
This article explores key topics likely to shape 2026 regulatory agenda in the advertising and marketing industry in both the UK and the EU.
The ASA has upheld a complaint that an ad for shower gel included a racial stereotype and was therefore likely to cause serious offence.
The ASA considered whether the models in four ads on Zara’s website appeared unhealthily thin. It deemed two ads irresponsible on that basis, while finding no breach in the other two. This ruling shows that “unhealthily thin” is about representation within an ad, not just a model’s size.
The ASA ruled against Viridian International for misleading advertising claims, including “no junk” and “100% active ingredients,” and for disparaging competitors.