Knit ad unravels under ASA scrutiny
The ASA upheld a complaint against Charmfay Shop’s online ad for a hooded jumper, finding that the claims and imagery had not been substantiated and were misleading.
The ASA upheld a complaint against Charmfay Shop’s online ad for a hooded jumper, finding that the claims and imagery had not been substantiated and were misleading.
The ASA upheld complaints against WiggyDog’s ad for a robot-dog toy, finding that claims and imagery exaggerated the product’s realism and functionality.
The International Chamber of Commerce has released a guide for marketers on how AI applies to its Advertising and Marketing Communications Code.
The ASA has upheld complaints against Kit & Kin’s green marketing for its nappy and wipes range, finding that “eco”, “sustainable” and “biodegradable” claims were absolute, unsubstantiated and gave a misleading impression of the products’ environmental impact.
ASA-commissioned research finds that consumers struggle to distinguish influencer ads from organic social media content and want clear, prominent disclosure labels. Labels such as “Commission Paid”, “Paid Partnership” and “Ad” were seen as the most effective.
CAP publishes an article explaining the ASA’s remit in relation to cross-border ads.
CAP publishes guidance on the presentation of VAT in ads.
The CMA provides clarification on supply chain responsibility when making environmental claims in new guidance supplementing the Green Claims Code and sector-specific guidance on making green claims about fashion products.
The ASA has ruled against three advertisers for promoting prescription-only medicines (POMs) advertising weight-loss medications, finding some also irresponsible for exploiting consumers’ insecurities around body image.
The ASA has challenged ads for Nike, Lacoste and Superdry for overstating the environmental benefits of their clothing, in the latest move against greenwashing in retail fashion sector.
The ASA has ruled on “from” price claims and urgency claims in advertisements for hotel bookings.
The ASA has ruled that Domestika’s “98% OFF” price claim was misleading because the discounted price was available only to consumers who signed up for a free trial of a subscription service.