English High Court considers when ads are comparative by implication
English High Court considers when ads could be considered comparative in nature, composition, efficacy and/or quality by implication. Anna Matsiienko and Louisa Morrison report.
English High Court considers when ads could be considered comparative in nature, composition, efficacy and/or quality by implication. Anna Matsiienko and Louisa Morrison report.
ASA provides another ruling which highlights the strict regulation of health claims in relation to food supplements. Stefanie Lo reports.
CAP has announced new rules and guidance on the advertising of alcohol alternative products. Gregory Barton reports.
UK government has published its response to its “Creating a smokefree generation and tackling youth vaping” consultation, new legislation to follow. Greg Barton and Samantha Rooney report
The ASA has ruled on a social media post by influencer promoting The Savoy. The case underscores the necessity of transparent advertising in influencer marketing, urging businesses to prioritise clarity in their campaigns for consumer trust. James Sharpley reports.
Essex County Cricket Club’s cryptoasset post sparks ASA scrutiny. TK Spiff reports.
ASA deems Team RH’s subscription ad misleading as it fails to make clear the minimum subscription period Gabby Thornton reports.
The ASA finds price claims made by an online retailer of medical products to be misleading. Anna Matsiienko reports.