Dance app missteps with “free” subscription claim
ASA rules that a dance app using a money back model cannot be descried as “free”.
ASA rules that a dance app using a money back model cannot be descried as “free”.
CAP’s enforcement notice and guidance note on loot box disclosure reinforce ASA rulings requiring mobile game publishers to disclose the presence of loot boxes and clearly signpost prize probabilities.
The ASA upheld complaints against train operating companies for unsubstantiated “lowest price” advertising claims, finding that neither operator could demonstrate it would beat competitors’ prices given the regulated rail fare framework and the availability of split-ticketing services.
CAP publishes an article explaining the ASA’s remit in relation to cross-border ads.
The ASA has published rulings on price savings claims in the energy sector as part of its wider work on advertising for greener heating and insulation products.
The ASA has ruled on “from” price claims and urgency claims in advertisements for hotel bookings.
The ASA has ruled that Domestika’s “98% OFF” price claim was misleading because the discounted price was available only to consumers who signed up for a free trial of a subscription service.
ASA upheld three complaints against an online wine retailer on unsubstantiated “same wine” claims, ambiguous “80% off” messaging and a £5 promotion failing to clarify its 48‑hour limit.
The ASA upholds a complaint against Select Specs for misleading comparisons and price claims in its adverts.
The ASA has upheld three complaints against Hammonds Furniture Ltd, finding its use of a countdown clock misleading and its “unbeatable price” claims for bespoke furniture inadequately substantiated and unverifiable.
The ASA rules that admin errors do not excuse misleading promotional discounts.
The ASA finds that a marketer had to inform consumers that a subscription was subject to a fixed term of 12 months at the start of their purchasing journey rather than just at the checkout.