Eye opener: ASA rules against Select Specs misleading comparison ad
The ASA upholds a complaint against Select Specs for misleading comparisons and price claims in its adverts.
The ASA upholds a complaint against Select Specs for misleading comparisons and price claims in its adverts.
The ASA has upheld three complaints against Hammonds Furniture Ltd, finding its use of a countdown clock misleading and its “unbeatable price” claims for bespoke furniture inadequately substantiated and unverifiable.
The ASA rules that admin errors do not excuse misleading promotional discounts.
The ASA finds that a marketer had to inform consumers that a subscription was subject to a fixed term of 12 months at the start of their purchasing journey rather than just at the checkout.
The ASA has found a pricing claim misleading due to the omission of material information.
Prime time to review misleading consumer journeys
The ASA rules that Trainline’s best price guarantee constituted a unsubstantiated lowest price claim.
ASA research and rulings shed light on the use of claims like “recyclable”, “compostable” and “biodegradable”.
Reminder from CAP to maintain transparent marketing practices for ticket sales.
The ASA rules that dynamic pricing and use of third party data are not reasons to excuse LoveHolidays for displaying out-of-date and inaccurate prices.
The ASA ruled that MyFlowers’ ads were misleading by implying that same-day delivery was available nationwide when it was limited to London.
ASA finds ads misleading for implying that advertisers based overseas were based in the UK and omitting the marketers’ geographical addresses.