Dance app missteps with “free” subscription claim
ASA rules that a dance app using a money back model cannot be descried as “free”.
ASA rules that a dance app using a money back model cannot be descried as “free”.
The ICO has published guidance on a new PECR exception, introduced by the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, that allows charities to send electronic marketing to individuals without prior consent subject to conditions.
The Court of Appeal holds that the test for consent under the UK GDPR and PECR is objective.
The ICO has published final guidance on storage and access technologies under PECR, incorporating new sections on the exceptions for statistical purposes, appearance and emergency assistance introduced by the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, and provided an update on its online tracking strategy.
The ASA upheld complaints against Untamed Cat Food’s ad, ruling that claims about competitor meat content in cat food and cats’ nutritional needs were misleading and insufficiently substantiated.
The ASA has upheld complaints against an ad for an AI video app, rendering it irresponsible, harmful and likely to cause serious offence under the CAP Code.
The ASA upheld a complaint against Charmfay Shop’s online ad for a hooded jumper, finding that the claims and imagery had not been substantiated and were misleading.
The International Chamber of Commerce has released a guide for marketers on how AI applies to its Advertising and Marketing Communications Code.
The ASA issues its first rulings clarifying the scope of the “less healthy” food advertising restrictions.
The UK Civil Aviation Authority has published a framework setting out guidance and principles on the environmental information airlines and other booking organisations should provide to passengers.
The ASA has upheld complaints against Kit & Kin’s green marketing for its nappy and wipes range, finding that “eco”, “sustainable” and “biodegradable” claims were absolute, unsubstantiated and gave a misleading impression of the products’ environmental impact.
The ASA found that ZING Toothpaste’s ads were misleading because they displayed five-star ratings and review counts that closely mimicked Trustpilot’s format but were not supported by the company’s actual Trustpilot profile.