Latest in Vidal Hall & Ors vs Google
On the eve of the hearing of an appeal by Google in a potential landmark case in the world of online behavioural advertising and privacy, there has been a significant development. George Garrard reports.
On the eve of the hearing of an appeal by Google in a potential landmark case in the world of online behavioural advertising and privacy, there has been a significant development. George Garrard reports.
After its sales staff allegedly sought address data of business customers’ employees in order to offer them Debeka’s consumer products, the Rhineland Palatinate privacy authority handed down a large fine and obtained undertakings. Flemming Moos of Osborne Clarke Hamburg reports.
A directive simplifying Europe’s laws on misleading and comparative advertising and an “evaluation” of the E-Privacy Directive are just two of the items relevant to advertisers in the EC’s “to do” list for 2015. Hannah Willson reports.
In a timely move, the ASA’s sister body has published helpful tips on the pitfalls for marketers targeting consumers who want to lose weight, “detox” or stop smoking in 2015. Anna Williams reports.
Nearly four years on from the dramatic extension of the CAP Code’s remit to non-paid-for marcoms online, CAP has produced guidance on the tests applied to establish when communications are covered by the extended Code. Fiona Schneider reports.
The First Tier Tribunal heard another appeal against a monetary penalty notice imposed by ICO for Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations breaches. Was it ICO’s lucky day this time around? Ben Dunham reports.
Matthew Devlin, a director of three marketing and telecoms companies, used subterfuge to access details of hundreds of EE’s customers, then used these to promote his competing services. Did the courts throw the book at him? Hannah Willson reports.
Catch their slides here.