ASA rules that AI video app ad crossed the line
The ASA has upheld complaints against an ad for an AI video app, rendering it irresponsible, harmful and likely to cause serious offence under the CAP Code.
The ASA has upheld complaints against an ad for an AI video app, rendering it irresponsible, harmful and likely to cause serious offence under the CAP Code.
The ASA upheld a complaint against Charmfay Shop’s online ad for a hooded jumper, finding that the claims and imagery had not been substantiated and were misleading.
The ASA upheld complaints against WiggyDog’s ad for a robot-dog toy, finding that claims and imagery exaggerated the product’s realism and functionality.
The International Chamber of Commerce has released a guide for marketers on how AI applies to its Advertising and Marketing Communications Code.
The ASA found that a Betway ad clearly depicted Sir Lewis Hamilton, a personality of strong appeal to under 18s, and that creative tweaks and platform targeting were not enough to avoid a breach of the “strong appeal” rules.
The ASA holds online pharmacies responsible for customers’ social media posts sharing weight-loss medication referral codes.
The ASA found that ZING Toothpaste’s ads were misleading because they displayed five-star ratings and review counts that closely mimicked Trustpilot’s format but were not supported by the company’s actual Trustpilot profile.
ASA-commissioned research finds that consumers struggle to distinguish influencer ads from organic social media content and want clear, prominent disclosure labels. Labels such as “Commission Paid”, “Paid Partnership” and “Ad” were seen as the most effective.
CAP publishes an article explaining the ASA’s remit in relation to cross-border ads.
The ASA has ruled against three advertisers for promoting prescription-only medicines (POMs) advertising weight-loss medications, finding some also irresponsible for exploiting consumers’ insecurities around body image.
The ASA has published rulings on price savings claims in the energy sector as part of its wider work on advertising for greener heating and insulation products.
The ASA has ruled that Domestika’s “98% OFF” price claim was misleading because the discounted price was available only to consumers who signed up for a free trial of a subscription service.